Smitty Wrote:
Another way to look at it.
Hays $50 sanctioning, $10 X 25 nonmembers = $250, $3 x 100 people = $300. The PDGA makes $600 because you ran a PDGA event.
Now Colorado runs the same size event on the same day. They PDGA will get $1200 instead and do the same amount of work.
The numbers are slightly off (either that or I misunderstood how you arrived at the $1,200 figure) - check out the following:
C tournament: sanctioning $50; $10 x 25 nonmembers = $250; $2 x 100 people = $200; total to PDGA = $500
B tournament: sanctioning $75; $10 x 25 nonmembers = $250; $3 x 100 people = $300; total to PDGA = $625
A tournament: sanctioning $100; $0 x 25 nonmembers = $0 (only members get to play); $4 x 100 people = $400; total to PDGA = $500
As one can see, the PDGA doesn't receive a significantly different benefit from the three levels of sanctioning using the breakdown that was proposed. Of course, changing the turn-out or the nonmember mix can effect things significantly. On the other hand, if one was comparing the revenue from one tournament to two tournaments on the same day, the effect probably wouldn't be quite the doubling that you showed but the effort at the PDGA level would double instead of being the same as was indicated. Again, no significant difference in revenue compared to PDGA effort involved.
When the board has discussed this issue, our discussions range around what is best for our members and disc golf in general. We haven't even considered the revenue line (maybe not a wise approach).
Other than that, I tend to agree with both Smitty's and Lizard's thoughts.